All Issue

2025 Vol.35, Issue 5

Technical Note

31 October 2025. pp. 481-497
Abstract
References
1

Barker, J.A., 1988, A generalized radial flow model for hydraulic tests in fractured rock, Water Resources Research, 24(10), 1796-1804.

10.1029/WR024i010p01796
2

Beauheim, R.L., Roberts, R.M., and Avis, J.D., 2004, Well testing in fractured media: flow dimensions and diagnostic plots, Journal of Hydraulic Research, 42, 69-76.

10.1080/00221680409500049
3

Bourdet, D., Ayoub, J.A., and Pirard, Y.M., 1989, Use of pressure derivative in well-test interpretation, Society of Petroleum Engineers, 4, 293-302.

10.2118/12777-PA
4

Bourdet, D., Whittle, T.M., Douglas, A.A., and Pirard, Y.M., 1983, A new set of type curves simplifies well test analysis, World Oil, 196(6), 95-106.

5

Chakrabarty, C., and Enachescu, C., 1997, Using the deconvolution approach for slug test analysis: Theory and application, Groundwater, 35(5), 797-806.

10.1111/j.1745-6584.1997.tb00148.x
6

Doe, T.W., and Geier, J.E., 1990, Interpretation of fracture system geometry using well test data, Stripa project 91-03, SKB, Stockholm, Sweden, p.220.

7

Enachescu, C., and Rahm, N., 2007, Method evaluation of single hole hydraulic injection tests at site investigations Oskarshamn, SKB P-07-79, Stockholm, Sweden, p.103.

8

Enachescu, C., Dmour, H., and Ács, V., 2016, Integrated well test interpretation of a naturally fractured carbonate reservoir-A case study, MOLGROUP Professional Journal, 100-109.

9

Enachescu, C., Frieg, B., and Wozniewicz, J., 2004, A new visual synthesis tool for transient data, US EPA/NGWA fractured rock conference, Portland Maine, 173-184.

10

Ferroud, A., Chesnaux, R., and Rafini, S., 2018, Insights on pumping well interpretation from flow dimension analysis: The learnings of a multi-context field database, Journal of Hydrology, 556, 449-474.

10.1016/j.jhydrol.2017.10.008
11

Follin, S., Ludvigson, J.E., and Leven, J., 2011, A comparison between standard well test evaluation methods used in SKB’s site investigations and the generalized radial flow concept, SKB P-06-54, Stockholm, Sweden, p.55.

12

Hamm, S.-Y., Cha, Y.-H., and Cheong, J.-Y., 2005, Hydrogeological properties of unconsolidated formations and bedrocks in the central area of Busan metropolitan city, The Journal of Engineering Geology, 15(4), 407-421.

13

Hjerne, C., Ludvigson, J.-E., Harrström, J., Olofsson, C., Gokall-Norman, K., and Walger, E., 2013, Single-hole injection tests in boreholes KA2051A01, KA3007A01 and KJ0050F01, SKB P-13-24, Stockholm, Sweden, p.184.

14

Horne, R.N., 1990, Modern Well Test Analysis, A Computer-Aided Approach. Petroway, Inc., Palo Alto, CA, p.197.

15

Horne, R.N., 1995, Modern Well Test Analysis, A Computer-Aided Approach. Petroway, Inc., Palo Alto, CA, p.257.

16

Igwebuike, N., Muchingami, I., Chunga, B., and Kanyerere, T., 2024, Unveiling subsurface heterogeneity in porous aquifers: Insights from Hydrogeophysics and derivative analysis, Journal of African Earth Sciences, 214, 105275.

10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2024.105275
17

Ishii, E., 2018, Assessment of hydraulic connectivity of fractures in mudstones by single-borehole investigations, Water Resources Research, 54(5), 3333-3356.

10.1029/2018WR022556
18

Jacob, C.E., and Lohman, S.W., 1952, Non-steady flow to a well of constant drawdown in an extensive aquifer, Trans. American Geophys. Union, 33, 559-569.

10.1029/TR033i004p00559
19

Kim, B.-S., Yang, D.-C., and Yeo, I.W., 2010, Estimation of hydraulic parameters of a fractured rock aquifer using derivative analysis, Journal of Soil and Groundwater Environment, 15(6), 46-52.

20

Kim, K.-Y., Lee, C.-W., Kim, Y., and Woo, N.-C., 2003, Hydraulic analysis of fractured rock aquifer using a simplified model based on aquifer test, Journal of the Geological Society of Korea, 39(3), 359-370.

21

Lee, H., Park, C., Park, E.-S., Cheon, D.-S., Choi, J., and Park, E.-S., 2024a, A study on hydrogeological characteristics of deep-depth rock aquifer by rock types in Korea, Tunnel and Underground Space, 34(4), 374-392.

22

Lee, H., and Park, C., 2024b, A study on comparative analysis of hydraulic conductivity in injection and recovery phases of constant pressure injection tests in deep fractured rock, Tunnel and Underground Space, 34(5), 503-526.

10.7474/TUS.2024.34.5.503
23

Lee, H., 2024c, Improvement of hydraulic properties by derivative diagnostic analysis in deep fractured rock, Tunnel and Underground Space, 34(6), 647-662.

24

Lee, H., and Lee, C., 2025a, A study on evaluation of hydraulic properties of deep fractured rock using long-term pumping test data and diagnostic analysis of head derivative, Tunnel and Underground Space, 35(1), 16-27.

10.7474/TUS.2025.35.1.016
25

Lee, H., Shin, Y.J., Kang, H.B., Jeon, S., Kim, K.S., and Park, C., 2025b, A study on in-situ hydraulic test for evaluating the hydraulic conductivity of excavation disturbed zone (EDZ) in fractured rock, Tunnel and Underground Space, 35(2), 149-165.

10.7474/TUS.2025.35.2.149
26

Lee, H., and Park, C., 2025c, Application of Agarwal’s method for analysis of recovery data following constant pressure injection test in fractured rock, Tunnel and Underground Space, 35(3), 194-209.

10.7474/TUS.2025.35.3.194
27

Lee, H., Park, C., Park, E.-S., Jung, Y.-B., Cheon, D.-S., Bae, S., and Kim, H.-M., 2023, Standard procedures and field application case of constant pressure injection test for evaluating hydrogeological characteristics in deep fractured rock aquifer, Tunnel and Underground Space, 33(5), 348-372.

10.7474/TUS.2023.33.5.348
28

Ludvigson, J.-E., Hansson, K., and Hjerne, C., 2007, Method evaluation of single-hole hydraulic injection tests at site investigations in Forsmark, SKB P-07-80, Stockholm, Sweden, p.162.

29

Mattar, L., 1999, Derivative analysis without type curves, Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology, 38(13), PETSOC-99-13-63.

10.2118/99-13-63
30

Peres, A.M.M., Onur, M., and Reynolds, A.C., 1989, A new analysis procedure for determining aquifer properties from slug test data, Water Resources Research, 27(7), 1591-1602.

10.1029/WR025i007p01591
31

Pesendorfer, M., and Loew, S., 2010, Subsurface exploration and transient pressure testing from a deep tunnel in fractured and karstified limestones (Lötschberg Base Tunnel, Switzerland), International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 47(1), 121-137.

10.1016/j.ijrmms.2009.09.013
32

Renard, P., Glenz, D., and Mejias, M., 2009, Understanding diagnostic plots for well-test interpretation, Hydrogeology Journal, 17, 589-600.

10.1007/s10040-008-0392-0
33

Rogers, S., Enachescu, C., Trice, R., and Buer, K., 2007, Integrating Discrete Fracture Network Models and Pressure Transient Data for Testing Conceptual Fracture Models of the Valhall Chalk Reservoir, Norwegian North Sea, In: Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 270, 193-204.

10.1144/GSL.SP.2007.270.01.13
34

Rogers, S., Lim, D.-H., Fejer, P., and Hang, G., 2012, Static and dynamic data integration for improved characterisation of a fractured gas reservoir, In Proceedings of the 46th US Rock Mechanics/Geomechanics Symposium, American Rock Mechanics Association, Chicago, IL, USA, 24-27.

35

Spane, F.A.Jr., and Wurstner, S.K., 1993, Deriv: A computer program for calculating pressure derivatives for use in hydraulic test analysis, Ground Water, 31(5), 814-822.

10.1111/j.1745-6584.1993.tb00855.x
36

Streltsova, T.D., 1988, Well Testing in Heterogeneous Formations-An Exxon Monograph, p.413.

37

Takeuchi, S., Saegusa, H., Amano, K., and Takeuchi, R., 2013, Hydrogeological characterization of deep subsurface structure at the Mizunami Underground Research Laboratory, The Journal of the Geological Society of Japan, 119(2), 75-90.

10.5575/geosoc.2011.0013
38

Yang, C.-F., Chi, W.-C., Ke, C.-C., and Lin, C.-J., 2024, Application of seismically derived tilt signals to characterize groundwater flow regimes: An example from a constant-rate pumping test in Taiwan, Journal of Hydrology, 645, 132188.

10.1016/j.jhydrol.2024.132188
Information
  • Publisher :Korean Society for Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering
  • Publisher(Ko) :한국암반공학회
  • Journal Title :Tunnel and Underground Space
  • Journal Title(Ko) :터널과 지하공간
  • Volume : 35
  • No :5
  • Pages :481-497
  • Received Date : 2025-09-12
  • Revised Date : 2025-10-10
  • Accepted Date : 2025-10-10