All Issue

2022 Vol.32, Issue 3 Preview Page

Original Article

30 June 2022. pp. 203-218
Abstract
References
1
Abate, J. and Whitt, W., 2006, A unified framework for numerically inverting Laplace transforms. INFORMS Journal on Computing, 18(4): 408-421. 10.1287/ijoc.1050.0137
2
Baisch, S., Vörös, R., Weidler, R., and Wyborn, D., 2009, Investigation of Fault Mechanisms during Geothermal Reservoir Stimulation Experiments in the Cooper Basin, AustraliaInvestigation of Fault Mechanisms during Geothermal Reservoir Stimulation Experiments: Cooper Basin. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 99(1): 148-158. 10.1785/0120080055
3
Chang, K. W., Yoon, H., Kim, Y., and Lee, M. Y., 2020, Operational and geological controls of coupled poroelastic stressing and pore-pressure accumulation along faults: Induced earthquakes in Pohang, South Korea. Scientific reports, 10(1): 1-12. 10.1038/s41598-020-58881-z32034215PMC7005858
4
Charléty, J., Cuenot, N., Dorbath, L., Dorbath, C., Haessler, H., and Frogneux, M., 2007, Large earthquakes during hydraulic stimulations at the geothermal site of Soultz-sous-Forêts. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 44(8): 1091-1105. 10.1016/j.ijrmms.2007.06.003
5
Davis, S. D. and Frohlich, C., 1993, Did (or will) fluid injection cause earthquakes?-criteria for a rational assessment. Seismological Research Letters, 64(3-4): 207-224. 10.1785/gssrl.64.3-4.207
6
De Simone, S., Carrera, J., and Vilarrasa, V., 2017, Superposition approach to understand triggering mechanisms of post-injection induced seismicity. Geothermics, 70: 85-97. 10.1016/j.geothermics.2017.05.011
7
Deichmann, N. and Ernst, J., 2009, Earthquake focal mechanisms of the induced seismicity in 2006 and 2007 below Basel (Switzerland). Swiss Journal of Geosciences, 102(3): 457-466. 10.1007/s00015-009-1336-y
8
Dorbath, L., Cuenot, N., Genter, A., and Frogneux, M., 2009, Seismic response of the fractured and faulted granite of Soultz-sous-Forêts (France) to 5 km deep massive water injections. Geophysical Journal International, 177(2): 653-675. 10.1111/j.1365-246X.2009.04030.x
9
Ellsworth, W. L., 2013, Injection-induced earthquakes. science, 341(6142), 1225942. 10.1126/science.122594223846903
10
Galis, M., Ampuero, J. P., Mai, P. M., and Cappa, F., 2017, Induced seismicity provides insight into why earthquake ruptures stop. Science advances, 3(12), eaap7528. 10.1126/sciadv.aap752829291250PMC5744472
11
Hanks, T. C. and Kanamori, H., 1979, A moment magnitude scale. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 84(B5), 2348-2350. 10.1029/JB084iB05p02348
12
Itasca Consulting Group, Inc., 2011, UDEC (Universal Distinct Element Code), Version 5.0. Minneapolis: ICG.
13
Kim, H. M., Guglielmi, Y., Rutqvist, J., and Park, E. S., 2019, A Technical Review of Hydromechanical Properties of Jointed Rock Mass accompanied by Fluid Injection. Tunnel and underground space, 29(1): 12-29.
14
Kim, K. I., Min, K. B., Kim, K. Y., Choi, J. W., Yoon, K. S., Yoon, W. S., ... and Song, Y., 2018, Protocol for induced microseismicity in the first enhanced geothermal systems project in Pohang, Korea. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 91: 1182-1191. 10.1016/j.rser.2018.04.062
15
Kim, K. I., Yoo, H., Park, S., Yim, J., Xie, L., Min, K. B., and Rutqvist, J., 2022, Induced and triggered seismicity by immediate stress transfer and delayed fluid migration in a fractured geothermal reservoir at Pohang, South Korea. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 153, 105098. 10.1016/j.ijrmms.2022.105098
16
Korean Government Commission (KGC), 2019, Summary report of the Korean Government Commission on relations between the 2017 Pohang Earthquake and EGS Project. Geological Society of Korea.
17
Kraft, T. and Deichmann, N., 2014, High-precision relocation and focal mechanism of the injection-induced seismicity at the Basel EGS. Geothermics, 52, 59-73. 10.1016/j.geothermics.2014.05.014
18
Langenbruch, C., Ellsworth, W. L., Woo, J. U., and Wald, D. J., 2020, Value at induced risk: Injection‐induced seismic risk from low‐probability, high‐impact events. Geophysical Research Letters, 47(2), e2019GL085878. 10.1029/2019GL085878
19
Majer, E., Nelson, J., Robertson-Tait, A., Savy, J., and Wong, I., 2012, Protocol for addressing induced seismicity associated with enhanced geothermal systems. US Department of Energy, 52. 10.2172/1219482
20
McClure, M. W., 2015, Generation of large postinjection‐induced seismic events by backflow from dead‐end faults and fractures. Geophysical Research Letters, 42(16), 6647-6654. 10.1002/2015GL065028
21
McGarr, A., 2014, Maximum magnitude earthquakes induced by fluid injection. Journal of Geophysical Research: solid earth, 119(2): 1008-1019. 10.1002/2013JB010597
22
Mukuhira, Y., Dinske, C., Asanuma, H., Ito, T., and Häring, M. O., 2017, Pore pressure behavior at the shut‐in phase and causality of large induced seismicity at Basel, Switzerland. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 122(1): 411-435. 10.1002/2016JB013338
23
Park, S., Kim, K. I., Xie, L., Yoo, H., Min, K. B., Kim, M., ... and Meier, P., 2020, Observations and analyses of the first two hydraulic stimulations in the Pohang geothermal development site, South Korea. Geothermics, 88: 101905. 10.1016/j.geothermics.2020.101905
24
Schoenball, M. and Kohl, T., 2013, The peculiar shut-in behavior of the well GPK2 at Soultz-sous-Forêts. GRC Trans, 37: 217-220.
25
Segall, P. and Lu, S., 2015, Injection‐induced seismicity: Poroelastic and earthquake nucleation effects. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 120(7): 5082-5103. 10.1002/2015JB012060
26
Shapiro, S. A., 2015, Fluid-induced seismicity. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139051132
27
Verruijt, A., 2013, Theory and problems of poroelasticity. Delft University of Technology.
28
Yim, J., 2018, A Basic Study on the Injection-induced Seismicity During Shut-in Stage, Master Thesis, Seoul National University.
Information
  • Publisher :Korean Society for Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering
  • Publisher(Ko) :한국암반공학회
  • Journal Title :Tunnel and Underground Space
  • Journal Title(Ko) :터널과 지하공간
  • Volume : 32
  • No :3
  • Pages :203-218
  • Received Date :2022. 04. 19
  • Revised Date :2022. 06. 23
  • Accepted Date : 2022. 06. 23